The National Model Design Code

Policy, Strategy + Design Guidance

The National Model Design Code and associated Guidance Notes are a major contribution to embedding good design in national and local policy

VISION

The vision for the NMDC is to provide a guide to writing local codes, rather than being a model code itself. This draws heavily on European zonal planning systems although we were not able to use the term ‘Zone’ so that we introduced ‘Area Types’. These are areas of consistent character and the Code sets out how guidance can be created for each Area Type that is, where possible, precise, quantifiable and verifiable. This is very difference to the previous approach to design Codes in the UK and has the potential to transform the way local design guidance is used.

 

IMPACT + DELIVERABILITY

There were some whose vision for the Model Code was as a default set of values. The idea being if no local guidance existed, then the National Design Code would apply. Both URBED and MHCLG staff believed that this was both impossible and undesirable given the variation in local circumstances.

The publish code is therefore a significant departure from the original concept in terms of impact and deliverability. It provides a process for identifying Area Types and consulting with local people to create locally relevant, practical and applicable guidance. The seven-step process is clear and easy for local authorities to follow and the guidance notes provide details of what codes should contain and how the policies should be framed. The images are even provided copyright free for use in local codes.

Most design guidance is subjective and while most people agree with its aim to promote quality design, it can be difficult to use the guidance to influence what developers are proposing or indeed to refuse poor schemes. The aim of the model code it to set out qualifiable parameters, such as density, building line, heights, boundary treatment, party wall condition etc…

The process has been piloted over the last four months with 14 local authorities receiving resources to pilot different aspects of the code. This has thrown up a some issues, mainly relating to the application of the code in inappropriate circumstances (such as a single site). However generally the process has been well received and the final version has not been published. These are yes/no issues that are easy for developers to follow and for planners to assess and incorporated in the NPPF.

 

WORTH NOTING

In many respects a good design code is about getting the basics right rather than promoting excellence. If the average quality of new development could be risen to the level of ‘good’ then we would have made huge progress. As the National Housing Audit demonstrated, at present a small amount of new housing is excellent while 75% is ‘mediocre’ or ‘poor’. We should always nod to excellence and we should certainly never stand in its way, but the greatest progress will be made by raising the average, which is what the NMDC seeks to do.

It is also important to note that the code guidance notes were bound by government policy and the extent to which of local planning authorities can exceed this. It was only able, for example, to promote the Future Homes Standard, the Nationally Described Space Standards, the 10% net biodiversity gain etc.

Project Team

MHCLG in house team under Chief Architect Andy Von Bradsky

Key Facts

Timescale: 1 year from commissioning to publication
Approximate cost: £80,000